After 4 years of Blogging, VIC Gets the First Death Threat

I have criticized the LTTE on my blog. Their supporters popped in here and commented with counter arguments. We argued, and comment threads went on and on.

I have criticized NGO’s in Sri Lanka. Their supporters sometime read my post and left a comment here and there. They were never emotionally bothered, because it’s just a “business matter” for them.

I have criticized the Free Media Movement. They never even bothered to read my posts, because they believe blogging is not a serious means of mass communication.

I have criticized Mervin Silva. Some people thought I’m all done! But nothing happened.

I have criticized the government when I extremely felt they deserve some criticism (Because, they are getting a hell of a lot of criticism from other bloggers, so I preferred to leave it to them)

I have criticized the UNP, and the JVP. The JHU, SLMC and Mano Ganeshan.

Criticizing all these people and organizations, I have never received a death threat or a threatening comment from any of them or their supporters.

But then! I checked for my emails at voiceincolombo AT gmail DOT com to find this message, sent to me weeks ago! (I never noticed it until today).


Ready to bring “good governance” and “democracy” with the General? He surely got some “Niyama Sri Lankikayo” around him!!!

Here’s the full text of the email from Niyama Sri lankikaya

from Niyama Sirilankan
to voiceincolombo@gmail.com

date Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:25 PM
subject Noise in Colombo
mailed-by yahoo.com
signed-by yahoo.com

hide details Dec 15 (13 days ago)
Ado ponna kariyo.. Thoge blog eke Rajapakshalata puka dena post daala kiyak hamba kara gannawa da ara Namal kariyagen? Tho dana ganin ponna huththo thoge olu katta pupurawanawa dana ganinin 26 wenida ta passe. Thopila ge rajjuruwo ta Miyanmar wala ta hari Libiya wa ta hari pana ganna puluwan 26 wenidata passe. Eth thopi inna wenne may rate ne? Parissamen hitapan. Yana ena than wala. Tho hithanne Voice of Colombo kiyala boru namak daa gaththa ta apita tho wa alla ganna behe kiyalada? Tho anith blog wala daapu comment walin thoge IPs api gawa thiyenawa. Tho dana ganin api ewa track karala tho inna thena hoya ganna wa. Tho pahugiya kale dagaluwa wedi. Bala gen hitapan thope rajjuruwan tai raja pawulatai wen de. Umbata ona nam thawa liyapan. Ara Mahinda Abeysekara la Sudarman la Asela Bandaranayake la ta wena sethe ma thamai umba tath wenne 26 weni da ta passe. Un nam danata math passport hada gena Visa apply kara la thiyenne. Tho kariya wa allala hama gahanawa dana ganin pakaya

Subscribe to A Voice in Colombo by Email

Somawansa Brothers. Professionals in Pasting Wall Posters! (JVP Advertisement)

Subscribe to A Voice in Colombo by Email

Sarath Fonseka Says Executive Presidency Will Remain in this Country for Next 50 to 100 years.

Earlier he said he is going to abolish executive presidency in 6 months after election, if he is elected. Later he said he is not going to abolish the executive presidency completely, to become another William Gopallawa (Meaning he wants power!). Now in a meeting today in Mawanella, Sarath Fonseka was saying

“A Tamil or Muslim can become the president of this country in another 50 years or 100 years. Americans voted black man Obama as the president to end racial conflicts between whites and blacks. Just like that, Sri Lankans as a one nation will vote a Tamil or a Muslim as the president of this country, in another 50 years”

What he is saying is good. Tamils or Muslims of this country should get the opportunity to run for presidency from either of the two major parties, and get voted as the president solely based on their policies; not based on their ethnicity. (Now what certain Tamil and Muslim candidates trying to do is attracting some racial votes. That should not be the way a Tamil or Muslim should contest the presidential election, on the day this country totally overcome the racial conflicts).

The problem in Sarath Fonseka’s speech this time is; he is expecting the “presidency” will remain in this country for next 50 to 100 years. We have to believe that he is talking about “executive presidency”, because only executive presidents get elected from public vote. Non-executive presidents doesn’t need to be elected from people’s vote, because it’s a waste of money to conduct national elections to appoint more “Willian Gopallawas”.

All in all; the cat is jumping out of Sarath Fonseka’s sack. He is not having any idea of abolishing the executive presidency if by any chance he get elected. I know for sure, if he wins; he will first appoint Managala Samaraweera as the “commander of Salvation Army”. He is such fond of revenge! Beware Mangi!!!

Subscribe to A Voice in Colombo by Email

Lal Kantha and UNP Votes

JVP MP Lal Kantha speaking in a UNP meeting in Anuradapura was virtually “begging” the UNP supporters to come to the polling booths and vote “Hansaya” instead of “Aliya” on 26th January. Isn’t this funny? JVP extended their support to Sarath Fonseka, with the promise of ensuring Fonseka will receive the most (if not all) JVP votes. Now why the f**** is Lal Kantha urging the UNP supporters to come forward? Isn’t it the job of UNP leaders to make sure all UNP votes will go to Fonseka? Lal Kantha knows well that there are no big vote base left for JVP anymore. That’s why they “jacked” up Fonseka, instead of placing their own candidate. He can’t ask JVP supporters to come forward and vote, because he knows it will not make a difference! Why are we giving this much of importance to a party which cannot make a difference?

Subscribe to A Voice in Colombo by Email

Request to Rupavahini & ITN. Please Tell Me Something That I Don’t Know!

Every time I “accidentally” switch to Rupavahini or ITN news, I smell a Pettah public toilet. It is so filthy with all mudslinging and party promotions. As a blogger, I have stated my stance of the upcoming presidential election that “I support Mahinda Rajapakshe”. But being a MR supporter, I can still feel how filthy the Rupavahini and ITN are. Ever since we can remember, state media had been biased to the government. And I think there was/is no problem in that. State media should be biased towards the government. The key word here is “government”. But present management and media men in Rupavahini & ITN are not actually being biased to the government, but they are actually being biased to the “governing party”. It is totally unacceptable! Using state media to promote the development activities and other “good looking” things done by the government and government ministers is one thing. Covering the electorate organizing campaigns of SLFP as news items and reporting them on prime time news is another thing. The present management of Rupavahini and ITN looks like in the belief that all government supporters in their audience are registered SLFP members, which is bullshit. There are many people like me, who supports the acts of this government, because it is a relatively a better one than the ones we experienced during last 30 years, but never want to be blind party men of SLFP or any collation partners of them. There are many people like me, who believes Mahinda is a great leader, but all his cabinet ministers (may be except 2 or three at most) are just donkeys. Such people will never tolerate, using Rupavahini and ITN as the official promotional agency of SLFP election campaign.

Mahinda doesn’t want exaggerated “wandi batta gatha” from people like Hudson Samarasinghe, Mahinda Abeysundara, or Sudharman Radaliyagoda to win this election. Just covering what Mahinda has done in the four years regime, and his speeches at various meetings will do it. If they stick to “covering what Mahinda has done, and said” as a policy, the opposition cannot criticize state media to be biased. Because, covering what has actually happened is what a media station should do anyway.

None of the political talk shows in these channels allow opposition voices. But we all know, the political talk shows get more convincing, if you allow all voices to be represented.

I don’t think these people are doing a favor for Mahinda’s campaign. To do a favor for Mahinda’s campaign, they should either retain the existing voters for Mahinda and/or convert existing voters from Sarath Fonseka. But the way these two channels and Hudson behave, a vast majority of existing Mahinda supporters who are not die-hard SLFP supporters may change their minds. On the other hand, existing Sarath Fonseka supporters will never even tune their TV into these two channels. They will actively block these channels, because they know these channels operate merely to sling mud at Sarath Fonseka, and do “wandi batta gee” for Mahinda. As a result, no matter how loud Mahinda Abeysundara or Hudson Samarasinghe shout; none of the Sarath Fonseka supporters will hear them. Therefore, even if they are making a valid point on why someone should not vote SF; the SF fans will not get that point.

In the final analysis, the way these two channels are behaving at present, what I can see is they are strengthening the SF campaign, but not MR campaign.


Having said all these, we cannot deny the fact that Sirasa TV too is openly canvassing for Fonseka these days. They are putting their full strengths in supporting Fonseka and ridiculing Mahinda’s camp (not Mahinda as an individual). But compared to how Rupavahini and ITN handle “mud”, Sirasa TV do it in a much professional manner, without getting themselves fall inside the mud basket.

Subscribe to A Voice in Colombo by Email

A Look Back at JVP’s Politics after 1989 Failed Revolution

JVP in 1994 (PE) – We believe Chandrika Bandaranayake is the best leader for this country, and we support her in this presidential election. She has pledged us to abolish executive presidency before XX July 19XX (I can’t remember the date).

JVP in 1999 (PE) – Chandrika cheated us! We made a mistake by supporting in last presidential election. Therefore we are placing our own candidate in this presidential election. We are confident he will win, and we will abolish the executive presidency after his appointment. (and their candidate gathers less than 3% of total votes)

JVP in 2000(GE) – Unuth ekai, Munuth ekai, Meda paara Api Javipe ta! (Both UNP & SLFP are the same, and we will vote JVP this time)

JVP in 2004 (GE) – Chandrika is not a cheater anymore. She is a good girl again. We trust her. Meda paara api “munuth” ekka ekata enawa! (We are contesting this election together with SLFP)

JVP in 2004 (Electing the PM) – Mahinda Rajapakshe is not qualified to be the prime minister. Give it to Lakshman Kadiragamar or keep it with Ratnasiri

JVP in 2005 (PE) – Mahinda Rajapakshe is the best candidate to be the president of Sri Lanka. We whole heartedly support him! He is the saviour of this country.

JVP Today – Mahinda Rajapakshe is the most corrupted dictator we ever had as a leader of this state. He is worse than JR. We did a mistake in supporting him in last presidential election. Let’s elect Sarath Fonskeka to bring good governance and democracy to Sri Lanka

JVP in another 6 years?????????????????????????????????????????

There is a similar profession to what JVP’s role in Sri Lankan politics after 1994. That profession is said to be the world’s oldest profession. And it is said that current JVP leader Somawansa Amarasinghe’s sister is an expert in that profession. May be he got this ability from his sister.

Subscribe to A Voice in Colombo by Email

How Sirikotha Planned the SOS Press Conference for Sarath Fonseka?

Airtel may well take Gen. Fonseka as one of their brand ambassadors. Because it’s a simple plan for General Sarath Fonseka to revoke statements to media!

1) Just tell a journalist whatever the idiotic thoughts coming to your head.
2) Let the journalist publish it
3) If it gains popularity, enjoy it!
4) If it backfires; call another press conference and tell that the “journalist misquoted me”.

Isn’t it a simple plan? Is this the level of “responsibility” we expect from a main candidate to be the president of this country? Is this the type person whom our friends like Liberal Lanka are believing that will be able to bring prosperity to our country? Is this the best “superior alternative” the UNJVP can put against Mahinda Rajapakshe?

He revoked his statement just after about 3 hours from my earlier blog post in which I mentioned that there is an attempt going on, for revoking the Sunday Leader article with a correction note. Entire this morning, the top people at Sirikotha was discussing how to react on “Fonseka’s stupid statement to Sunday Leader”. They were discussing alternative solutions of negating that blow to their campaign, and several phone calls were made to JVP leaders like Anura Kumara Disanayake and Somawanse Amarasinghe, asking for their advise. Things were worsen, when they heard the news that President Rajapakshe has made a statement saying “As the head of the state, I am ready to take any blame put on the army and its officers”. UNP leaders were worried, that Mahinda has cleverly leveraged Fonseka’s stupid statement for his advantage.

At around 11.00am today (Monday 14th), Gayantha Karunathilake called Sunday Leader editor and asked for a possibility of revoking the story with a correction note. The editor has mentioned, if the General himself make a request they are ready for such a move and immediately advised the journalist Frederica Jansz to come up with a story to put as an apology note. She has reportedly refused to do that but no news yet about what has happened thereafter.

. During next two hours, the story was well fabricated inside a house of another UNP MP, where Anura Kumara Disanayake was also present. Then they have met the General thereafter, and advised him what to tell in the press conference and what not to tell. They have advised not to answer in lengthy sentences for questions from journalists. “make short statements as much as possible. Then they will have to publish it as it is. If they add anything to interpret what you say, and if something goes wrong, we can later claim that your words were misquoted by the journalist”.


Around 2.00pm, the UNP called all media stations and newspapers for a special press conference on behalf of the General, and JVP has extended their support in hosting the press conference too. And what is said in the press conference is widely published everywhere now!

You are now not a traitor Gen.Fonseka. You are just a joker. Even Tenyson Cooray would have done a better job as an opposition common candidate, if he knew that the role of such a candidate is purely to provide jokes to the country.

Subscribe to A Voice in Colombo by Email

Sunday Leader is Asked to Publish a “Correction Note” to General’s Comments about Shavindra Silva

After the infamous “Sunday Mudlinger” article last weekend, the opposition campaigners for Gen. Sarath Fonseka’s presidential bid is in total uncertainty whether to continue backing him up for the election. General Fonseka’s accusation that it was Gotabhaya Rajapakshe who ordered the assassination of LTTE political wing leaders who surrendered with white flags and it was Brigadier Shavindra Silva who executed that order has add more negativity towards his campaigns, following up from his comments about the economic policy.

Several UNP key people have expressed their disagreement on what General Fonseka said. They in the belief that, it was a major blow to their campaign.

Now the opposition is trying to negate this set back, by issuing another statement from General Fonseka to say that “My words were misquoted by Sunday Leader journalist”. This is the exact same way he tackled his earlier remarks of “Sri Lanka is a Sinhala Bhudist only country”.

Sunday Leader, who are working very enthusiastically to support the Fonseka’s campaign, has given their agreement to accommodate a “correction note”. Frederica Jansz is asked by the editor in chief of the paper to issue a self confession to state that she mis-interpreted General’s words and hence a wrong message was communicated on the paper.

Subscribe to A Voice in Colombo by Email

@Lanka Liberal and Lanka Cricket. There are Questions Unanswered

@Lanka Liberal @Lanka Cricket,

I always liked your comments on my blogs. I love to read different opinions and specially aggressive ones at me. But, in the recent posts we’ve been dragged into arguments you have stopped replying at the point where I have invited you to “reveal your alternatives to Mahinda Rajapakshe regime?”. I acknowledged your rights to criticize the government. At the same time, I have clearly mentioned a criticism to be constructive; you have to suggest alternative and have a clear stand/stance of your opinion. Just throwing arguments here and there will not take anything “forward”. I know you don’t like “way forward”. All you want is a country where stagnating at a one place, where you can enjoy “criticizing without alternatives”; the job you are best at.

So, unless you are not part of the UNP “Kata Katha Hamudawa” like the people in Lankaenews.com and Lankanewsweb.com, please come forward and explain us your opinion on “what is best for this country at next presidential election?”. Just to remind you, as I mentioned in my blog “what is best” need not to be a “either with us or against us” stance. You have the freedom of chosing. But give us your opinion on what is best!!!. That’s the decision I want you to make.

The questions are opened to anyone! If you hate Rajapakshe regime, if you are a regular critc of them on blogosphere; you are most welcome to put forward your “way forward plan” in next election. We all know most of the things we discuss on blogs never get implemented anyway. So, it’s not a big deal to give a shot revealing your wildest dreams of becoming the president and eliminating corruption. Invitation open to Indi.ca and Sanjana Hattotuwa as well.

Subscribe to A Voice in Colombo by Email

General Fonseka Working Hard to Earn the “Traitor” Badge

In my very first blog post after General Fonseka’s official declaration of “war against Rajapakshes” I mentioned that no matter what silly decisions he will make in the future, he will remain a hero of this country, and our people (and me) will remember him as a hero for a long time into the future. However, despite my faith that Gen. Fonseka will safeguard his public honour as a national hero, he is fast becoming a victim of the traitorous camp and issuing statements that we can never be expecting from a war hero.

In an interview with the Sunday Mudslinger today, Gen. Fonseka has stated it was Gotabaya Rajapakshe who ordered and Brig. Shavindra Silva who executed the decision to kill LTTE political wing leader Pulithevan and Nadesan, after their surrender to the army with a white flag.

If what Gen. Sarath Fonseka is saying is true and if he is saying that, it was a “wrong decision” by Gota; that adds another reason to why we should not vote Gen. Fonseka in the next election.

As it was mentioned many a times on this blog, I believe the war victory was a collective effort and no one/two people should get a major portion of the credit for the goods, and blame for the bads that happened in the war. (I personally believe killing Pulithevan was a good idea!). This Gen. clearly violating the collective responsibility of the operation, and now putting blame on few individuals on the matters which are sensitive to the international human rights watchdogs. If put in simple language, Gen. Fonseka is trying to betray his former military colleagues and earn some credits from the western countries. Isn’t it just shameful?

I’m sorry General Fonseka… You no longer deserve to be a hero in my books. You worked hard to become a hero, and now you are working even hard to be a traitor.

Subscribe to A Voice in Colombo by Email

Wijaya Nandasiri Barred From Sirasa TV’s “Punchi Pahe Mang”. Sirasa Superstars Warned Not to Support Tharunyayata Hetak

Popular Sri Lankan tele-drama actor Wijaya Nandasiri who used to be the regular host of Sirasa TV’s local version of “Are you Smarter Than a Fifth Grader”; Punchi Pahe Mang was asked by the producers of the program to refrain from hosting the show until the presidential election is over. The reason is not made public, but internal sources at Sirasa TV said that there had been an argument between Mr. Nandasiri and a top producer of the TV channel regarding the actor’s decision to support the “Tharunyayata Hetak” mega campaign backing the president for the next election. Mr. Nandasiri, who appeared in the recent mega campaign supporting the president; was ridiculed by the producers at the set of Punchi Pahe Mang. Being an aggressive character off the screen (even though he normally appear in cool and comedy roles), Mr. Nandasiri has strongly reacted to the producers, citing examples of situations where Sirasa TV had been biased to the UNP and sometimes to the LTTE. Things has gone to a far extent, where the producers has asked him not to take part in any more episodes of the programs. Last 2 productions were hosted by Sirasa TV program director Kingsley Ratnayake himself.

Meanwhile the same internal source from Sirasa TV said that the finalists of first two seasons of Sirasa TV’s most popular reality TV show, Sirasa Superstar were officially advised by the program’s producers Susara Dinal and Nilendra Deshapriya; asking them not to support the Tharunyayata Hetak campaign.

Several other artists who participated in the campaign are inquiring from the TV station, as for the reasons why their songs are mysteriously sliding downwards in all the chart shows aired on Sirasa FM and Sirasa TV.

Subscribe to A Voice in Colombo by Email

Why Did UNJVP Wanted to Have a War Hero as Their Presidential Candidate? Here's the Master Plan

This is an extract from a reply comment I given to Lanka Cricket on my last blog post. I thought it is worth raising this as a separate blog post for discussion.

Lanka Cricket claimed "This election is not about choosing the best war hero; we need to move on."

But I think this election is. In fact the UNP and JVP (hereafter UNJVP) has converted this election into a contest to chose the best war hero. How?

That's why UNJVP wanted to have SF as their candidate. If this is not about choosing a war hero, UNP would have gone with Ranil, Sajith, SB, or Rukman and JVP with Somawansa, or may be even Sarath N Silva as a common candidate. UNJVP has made this election to a contest to select the best war hero by putting a war hero from their end and negating Mahinda's claim that the political credit of war victory should go to him. Now there's an opposition candidate who is claiming that he is the real hero of the war and he is asking for our "political" vote.

Why would the UNJVP wanted to keep a war hero as their candidate?

They wanted to attack on the strongest point of Mahinda, instead of attacking his weak points (corruption, cost of living, family politics, jumbo cabinet etc). Why UNP wanted to attack on Mahinda's strongest point instead of weak points? Because UNP knows that weak points are not significant for the people of this country. UNP tried attacking these weak points in all most all the past elections and they realized, people are not responding to them. They realized people are better responding to the "war victory" claim by Mahinda. UNP knows the level of corruption is not a huge concern for the general public of this country, even though their "Kata Katha Hamudawa" along with the media battalion in Sunday Leader and Lankaenews.com are exaggerating the facts. Corruption is only an issue for few Colombo based journalists (writing to Sunday Leader) and few NGO activists who are worried about they are not allowed to do their own corruption. UNP knows, people don't worry too much about the jumbo cabinet. UNP knows, people don't care much about Rajapakshe family involvement in MR government.

And UNP knows that people seriously value the war victory as a strong case for voting Mahinda. That's why they decided to attack on Mahinda's strongest point by converting this election into a "contest to pick the best war hero".

From a marketing perspective, UNJVP is having an edge in this election. Attacking the strongest point while putting pressure on weak points is a good strategy. I personally believe this is an idea of Mangala Samaraweera whom I used to know very well for a long time. This is a clever plan, and it will make a strong case study for marketers if this succeed.

Let's wait till 26th January and see what's the outcome. Will the public of this country get caught in this superb marketing strategy of UNJVP? Or, will they see the deceived danger in the proposition? I believe our people will not let room for a "post purchase dissonance" after 26th!

Subscribe to A Voice in Colombo by Email

My Stance on the Two Main Candidates of Upcoming Presidential Election

The heat of the presidential election is on, and we can feel it in the blogosphere as well. It’s getting heated! Lots of arguments are being shared, and lots of statements had been made. Sittingnut, Liberal Lanka, and even Lanka Cricket is having and opinion about the election. I have seen even Indi has posted a several posts related to the election. There were many more opinions on Kottu blogroll, which I can't remember now. Aim of writing this post is to get a few facts straight, before we move forward with any “presidential election” related argument on the blogosphere.

The Fact that We Cannot Deny: Are bloggers always needed to be unbiased? (Specially when the election is ahead, and we are given a chance to select a leader who will represent the ideology behind our blog posts?)

This is the funniest myth that I’ve ever seen in entire blogosphere. In fact this myth is believed only by the Sri Lankan bloggers. Bloggers are not media men. They are not journalists or reporters. Instead, bloggers are just individual citizens who voluntarily broadcast their ideas to the internet. In such a situation, isn’t it funny to be appear as “unbiased” just from the outer wrapper? Most of the bloggers commenting on my political blog posts trying themselves to be “non-aligned” to any major political party or for a leader. None of them explicitly tell “I support this candidate, or this party” . But, they are openly accusing certain politicians to be corrupt, cheaters, and not qualified enough to lead this country.

Let’s take for example the case with present president Mahinda Rajapakshe. There are dozens of bloggers on Kottu blogroll alone, who are posting day and night to convince us that “Mahinda is a dictator, Mahinda is a dick, Mahinda only cares his family, Mahinda is this, Mahinda is that, etc etc”. They are not only blogging on their blogs, but also commenting on other places. They say Mahinda’s government doesn’t allow media freedom, and violate human rights. When they are criticizing Mahinda, the implication is that they have in mind a better solution than Mahinda’s government to rule this country. A superior alternative! But how many of these people openly express their views on what is their superior alternative?

Let me guess. There can be two alternatives in broader terms. 1) To vote either UNP or JVP into power, and they will run a btter government. 2) A solution which is not known to us as of now (a military government? Making Sri Lanka a federal state of India or USA??)

So, if you are a blogger; and if you have your own opinion, which is steady like Sigiriya rock, and if you are having a backbone strong enough to stand the odds, why don’t you openly state your “superior alternative”?

We are now given the “democratic right” to elect a leader of our choice to run this country for next 6 years. If you are not happy with Mahinda, you can chose from a selection of minimum 5 other people including the great General, and the one and only Wickramabahu. So why don’t you openly say “this is what is best for this country”. What is best for this country might may be not even choosing a one out of the above-mentioned candidate. It may be another novel solution. But the fact remain, you should have a steady opinion and a strong backbone to tell your opinion.

My Stance on Mahinda Rajapakshe

I blog as a down to earth true Sri Lankan who understand the political realities of this country. Politics in Sri Lanka is not about getting the best that we want. It is about choosing best out of several bad options. That’s the reality. Under that reality, I believe Mahinda Rajapakshe is the best choice we can have in the upcoming presidential election as the leader of our country. I agree his government is corrupted. But as many of his opponents are saying, corruption is limited to few of his close family friends and his close relatives. Isn’t it better than opening the doors of corruption to everyone in the bureaucracy like during Premadasa era?
Many complain his government violates press freedom and assaulted/killed journalists. They compare Mahinda’s regime with 2 years of Ranil’s UNP government from 2002 to 2004. But how about UNP ruling from 1977 to 1994? Was there press freedom? Ok, let’s see how Ranil managed to minimize assaults on media people and killing them. It’s easy! He simply ordered all media stations to stop reporting politically sensitive news. Look back at that era. Every TV station stopped political talk shows during Ranil’s two years. Weekend newspaper columnists were writing about musical shows of UB 40, and Inner Circle. Was that press freedom?
What most people talk about Mahinda is his corruption and family dominance. But, how about the things he has done to this country. Before general Fonseka’s name was forwarded as the opposition (UNJVP) candidate, everyone accepted that the political leadership of Mahinda was the magic behind this war victory. Everybody cited example from Kobbakaduwa & Premadasa, etc, to say that even in the past we had the chance of eliminating the tigers but political leaders didn’t have the will and they didn’t backed up the army. If every one keep aside the “political jealousy” for a moment, it is an undeniable truth that Mahinda & Gota played a huge role in winning this role. Sarath Fonseka too played a massive role. He was capeable of doing that and that is why mahinda appointed him as the commander of the Army. If SF gets a credit for winning this war, Mahinda & Gota should get the credit of “giving the right place to right one”, which wasn’t the case during CBK era or Ranil era.

Apart from winning the war, Mahinda’s government managed to sustain the economy of this country despite the global economic crisis and heavy corruption by the government ministers. My point is, corruption would have been there (and worse) even if Ranil was the president. That’s a fixed fact. If we fix the “corruption” factor and compare, without any doubt Mahinda’s 4 years is the era with most value adding development projects in this country during last 30 years. If not, prove otherwise! (Prove that CBK, Ranil, Premadasa or JR did more development or with less corruption).

Given all these facts and many more (which I will reveal in the future), in the upcoming presidential election my vote will got to Mahinda Rajapakshe, and I expect he will gain a vote count in the range of 53% to 56% all the votes to win this election.

My stance about General Sarath Fonseka

As I’ve mentioned earlier in my blog, he will remain a national hero in my books no matter what. It is sad to see he is getting insuted by the government media and extremist Mahinda supporters, just because he decided to contest against Mahinda.

However, I also believe what happened to him as an “asking for trouble” situation (“Illagena kamak” in Sinhalese). As I’ve mentioned in one of my comments in a previous points, I would have been supporting Sarath Fonseka if he came into power in a military coup and throwing out Mahinda. That would have been the best way for him to come into power, and bring this country into the right track. But the path he took to fight Mahinda’s corruption is a corrupted path as well! Sarath Fonseka has tarnished his image as a potential benevolent dictator for this country, by aligning with people like Mano Ganeshan, Ranil Wickramasinghe, Rauf Hakeem, and Somawansa Amarasinghe. All of these politicians are just opportunists. They have pulled from the leg of Sarath Fonseka and Mahinda, when Mahinda and the government wanted the support of these people. Now SF has become a proxy of these same people to accomplish their dream of throwing out Mahinda and forming a government of their own, where Mano can continue with his LTTE propaganda and Hakeem can keep on arousing Muslim racism in East. Somawansa will remain the “Raja wasala Kawataya” (The role currently played by Wimal Weerawansa).

By looking at these facts, and the fundamental flaws in Fonseka campaign I mentiond in my earlier post I can conclude that Sarath Fonseka never going to be a viable solution as a president of this country in this election. I wish him all the best to gain at least 0.1% more than the votes what Ranil gained in 2005 election. But, my logic says he will be even an worst disaster than Srima Disanayake in 1994 presidential election.

Now that my stance has clearly stated, I expect some of you who read this to do the same if you have the courage.

Subscribe to A Voice in Colombo by Email

One fundemental error in Sarath Fonseka's Presidential Campaign

On one hand....
The retired Army Commander promises that by using the powers of the executive presidency, he will act to change the political culture of this country, end family dominated politics, end Rajapakshe dictatorship, bring economic prosperity to the country, clean up this country as he did with the Army, line up the people of this country towards winning the development war just like he lined up the army to win the war agains Prabhakaran, and many more positive and optimistic hopes for our people. He promises not to use the powers of executive presidency for his own benefit or to the benefit of his family members.Good!

On the other hand...
He is saying he will abolish the executive presidency within 6 months of his appointment as the president, and hand over the government to Ranil Wickramasinghe as a the care-taker prime minister until he get a 2/3 majority in the parliament. He is not mentioning who will be the PM of this 2/3 majority parliament.

Now the question..
If executive presidency is to be abolosihed within 6 months of his appointment, how can he deliver the above promises he makes? Once the executive presidency is abolished, Ranil will be the leader of the country. Then we have to believe that, General Fonseka is expecting to deliver the above promises through Ranil Wickramasinghe as the leader of the state, while Sarath Fonseka oversee what Ranil is doing. If Ranil does a bad job, Sarath Fonseka can't do anything, because he doesn't have executive powers to over rule the PM's decisions. In that sense, even if Sarath Fonseka becomes the president of this country in next election, Ranil will be running the show.

If that is the case, why don't Ranil him self run for the election; win; and abolish executive presidency?

This surface out the bitter turth that most (blindly) Sarath Fonseka fans never understand. Sarath is contesting not because that he loves the country. There's no questioning about his patritism. Sarath Fonseka is a true patriot, and we all must continue respecting him for what he has done for our country. But, in this situation, Sarath Fonseka is only acting as a proxy arm of Ranil Wickramasinghe. Because, Ranil doesn't have the "personality" to contest with Mahinda. Sarath does posses that character! So, what Sarath Fonseka is doing is merely "renting out" his personality ranil, and giving a bait to eat to "blindly patriotic" Sri Lankans. Blindly patriots will eat this bait. Regular UNP voters will also vote SF. Mano Ganeshan's and Hakeem's supporters will also vote SF because they also know the true hidden agenda. As a result, Sarath Fonseka will win with a 50.5% majority (Let's say!). If SF win like that Ranil will be the ultimate winner. Mano and Hakeem will also be winners.

Who will be the losers?
1) Sarath Fonseka himself
2) Of course Mahinda Rajapakshe and his family
3) SLFP
4) JVP (as the usual bunch of losers!)
5) Innocent but "blindly" patriotic Sri Lankans who believe Sarath Fonseka was the one and only "magic" of war victory over LTTE
6) Enitire Sri Lanka! - We will be turning our country back into the hands of people who signed MOU's with Prabhakaran. With the people who delivered speeches at Pongu Thamil with LTTE logo displayed on their chest!

Subscribe to A Voice in Colombo by Email

Three Questions to All JVP Supporters Who are Backing Up General Fonseka

In his speech last Satuday, Gen. Fonseka said that he is still a political novice, and he doesn't have a concrete economic vision to run our economy if he is elected. He further added, he will get the support of UNP and Ranil, because he believes that the UNP is the best political party who added value to the country's economy in the past, and that he believes UNP will be able to bring economic prosperity to Sri Lanka even in the future.

Now, we all know one fundemental point where JVP differs from UNP is the economic policiy. The two parties are in the exact two extremes of managing a country's economy (now, please don't try to justify that it is not the case). JVP blamed the UNP for last 30 years for ruining Sri Lanka's economy with the free market policies.

Now, under these conditions how can JVP support the same presidential candidate as what UNP is supporting? It is perfectly ok for UNP to support Gen. Fonseka, because he clearly accepted UNP's economic vision as a workable solution for Sri Lanka (which I also agree to a greater extent. Point at which I tend to disagree is, the present SLFP's economic vision is not also much different from UNP's. Key ministerial posts related to economic decisions in present government is handled by ex-UNP people. So, there won't be much of a difference there).

Here are the questions to all die-hard JVP supporters.

1) Are you willing to back-up (paste poster, put on cutouts, distribute hand-bills) a presidential candidate who is taking the UNP economic policy as the best solution for this country?
, un
2) If the answer is "Yes", under what grounds?

3) Do you believe that the economic policies of JVP and UNP can be co-exist in a same government? (UNP-SLFP co-existent: Can. SLFP-JVP co-existent: can. But, JVP-UNP???)

May be the people at lankatruth.com can discuss these three questions over a bottle of Gal Arrack, while "liberalizing the brain" a little bit.

Subscribe to A Voice in Colombo by Email