First; this expose us to the real face of those "guardians of freedom of speech". These people act like, that they value "freedom of speech" as the second most noble human right, after masterbaration. But, when their ego is challenged by some one else; they react so shamelessly, by using their authority to cut the voices against them and painting a picture to the outside world "he is a threat to Kottu security; so for the benefit of the majority of Kottu users, I had to remove him". Isn't this the same thing the government is doing to the journalists who criticize them? When government react to the journalists with censorship and (sometimes) violence, these people go up and down in the air saying "Look here! Mahinda is violating our freedom of speech!". But, when they do the same thing on a blog aggregator where they have the authority; they justify themselves with lame excuses. Nice work!
I remember Indi once said about Lasantha and Sunday Leader "No matter how much I agree or disagree with his journalism, he has a right to express his view". I can't locate the exact post he mentioned this, but that was the basic idea. Then what's the difference with Nibras Bawa? Reporting NB's blog to Blogger T&C violation is not much different from government using police to interrogate journalists in the 4th flour. In fact, government is better, because it has a vested authority to do so. But, reporting a blog of a person whom you don't agree with, is a cheap tactic to use for someone appearing to be a "matured" and a "reasonable" blogger, to the outside world.
I now can understand that, this whole thing started with this post made by RD; mentioning myself as well. While I respect RD's right to ask that question from the three of us; in real sense it's none of his business, the mannar of language we use in our blogs. And I totally reject the manner in which Nibras Bawa responded to RD. He was childish, too emotional, and immature. No argument. My assertion is, Nibras Bawa holds a "soda bottle" personality, and most of his reactions were instantaneous, without thinking of the consequences. This assertion is justifiable, because NB has taken measures to delete most of his offensive comments later (once the gas of the soda bottle die off). Indi interpreted this as "intentional effort" by NB to annoy other people (You post something "fuck you off son of a whore" and delete it as soon the target person read it). However, Indi would have thought kicking NB off the Kottu feed and painting a "security threat" picture about him on the Kottu feed is the best solution for him. In my personal opinion, Indi reacted emotionally, because Bawa hurt Indi's self esteem so hardly. It's quite understandable, when you blog in your real name, and "social credibility" is your prime motive for blogging.
Another notable thing is, Nibras Bawa is not the only one who got "censored" on Kottu. Why TamilNet.tv is not anymore syndicated on Kottu feed? I tried to find an answer to this question on past posts on Indi's blog, but I can't see anything where he commented about Tamilnet.tv. But the truth is, TamilNet.tv is silently taken off from the Kottu feed. If someone justify the removal of Tamilnet.tv from Kottu feed based on the fact that it actually is a satirical blog; then I ask the question, why not removing Jathika Chinthana Pravahaya blog from Kottu too? Why did Kottu allowed Ranjith Fernando Sucks? JCP is a little bit less obvious than Tamilnet.tv, and many people still believe JCP is a true "pro-Sinhala patriotic blog". But the truth is, it's run by a set of people who's intention is to redicule the concept of "Jathika Chinthanaya" put forward by most supporting forces of the present government. And the "mission" of JCP blog is perfectly matching the value system of Indi, and he is totally ok to host JCP on Kottu, while censoring the anti-LTTE Tamilnet.tv from the Kottu feed.
This again reveal the double standards of people who march behind the caskets of dead journalists, crying for "freedom of speech".
Last; for any online community to be vibrant and interesting; there should be fights between participants. Calling names, insulting, dis agreeing; these all are required for an online community to be vibrant. If the "god" interfere and try to make it "politically correct" based on a "code of speech" he designed by himself; then the whole purpose of having a community will be lost. The task of a good community manager is not to press the "ban" button at every trouble maker based on few complaints by "pet members"; but to bring consensus among the members of the community.
May be writing this blog post could be a great qualification for me to violate the Kottu "code of speech" and be kicked out at anytime. It's a concern for me; because I need the Kottu readership badly. Because, my mission is to provide them with the news on "other side of the coin". If you don't like Kottu readers to be aware of the other side of the story; you can kick me out at anytime. After all, it's your domain and your authority. I personally vote for bringing back Nibras Bawa and Tamilnet.tv to the Kottu feed, and giving back Passionately Patient a voice again. I don't know how the majority of Kottu community feel about them. My faith in freedom of speech is not only limted to Lasantha Wickramatunga and Sirasa News first.



